APPROVED
PLAN COMMISSION
February 7, 2008
Members Present: Ray Knapp, Dan Pearson, David Wolf, Mark Mitchell,
Members Excused: Paul Mahler, Chris Mueller, Bob Rolle
Staff Present: Rob Jones, Cedar Corp.
Recording Secretary: Sharon Weide
Others present: Perri Schiltgen, John Salmon, William W. Heideman, Cyril Cernohous, Jon Sonnentag, Jeff and Rita Haney, Jan Cuccia, Charlie Macdonell, Jason Bast, Kernon Bast, Barb Geissler
Call to Order
Ray Knapp called the meeting of the Town of
AGENDA:
1. Approve Minutes;
Minutes of the January Plan Commission meeting were
reviewed.
Mark Mitchell
moved to accept the minutes of the January 3 Plan Commission meeting. David Wolf seconded. Motion passed, all in favor.
2. Acknowledgement of applications for action as regulated by SDO;
There were none.
3. Concept review –
Jon Sonnentag presented on behalf of DCCI Land
Planners. Mark Mitchell asked to recuse
himself from this discussion. Jon went on
to say that this parcel in Section 17 was part of a concept plan during the
planning for Meadow Ridge. DCCI is
coming back now to begin work on this parcel.
He stated that the developer has no time table set yet and it may be a
year or two before work is started.
However, the applicant wanted to allow sufficient time to complete all
of the necessary approvals. All of the
development rights needed for this project were transferred in at the time of
Meadow Ridge of Troy. He distributed
layouts to the Plan Commission and went on to describe the project and possible
future connectivity to the remaining portion of Mr. Valley’s adjoining property
and Mr. Woodruff’s property to the north.
He noted that there is an agreement in place that Mr. Valley will grant
a 10,000 sq. foot easement for the road across his property. Jon asked for clarification of what kind of
connectivity the Town would like to see from the
Ray Knapp commented that in an earlier review of
this property the Plan Commission had clearly defined an expectation that there
would be access for pedestrian traffic between
Rob Jones said that in Cedar Corp. feels the most
important areas of discussion should be the road connectivity of the greater
project area, the placement of storm water management devices (these will need
to be substantial due to the amount of runoff), and the length of the proposed
cul-de-sac until the property is further developed. He suggested the possibility of a 12 foot
paved trail between
Dan Pearson asked about the drainage easement and
Jon clarified its location. All
Commission members would like the Woodruffs feedback on the layout and how it
fits with their vision for possible future development of their property to the
north. Ray is also concerned about the
buffering of the home on lot 35 and questioned if that home site could be
moved, possibly into lot 1. David Wolf
said he feels the project is laid out well. There was additional discussion
around existing screening from
Ray Knapp said that Mr. Schiltgen was concerned
about the location of the road into this development and asked if road could be
shifted to the north-east to partially address Mr. Schiltgen’s setback concerns. Jon said they may be able to shift the road
but he felt this placement was the best due to the topography. Ray Knapp asked for public comment.
Perri Schiltgen stated that he does not want any
setback imposed on his land. As such he
feels the road should be constructed further to the north-east into Mr.
Valley’s property. He went on to say
that there should be buffer zones between the proposed development and the 3
adjoining properties that are zoned exclusive agriculture. He wants the developer to construct a fence
between his property and
John Salmon contended that the existing storm water
management system in Meadow Ridge of Troy is poorly designed and that DCCI
should be required to correct it prior to developing any additional
property. He stated that he would like a
fence built by the developer along his property line and that it should be 5
wire, not 4. He said that when
Jeff Haney (resident from
Ray Knapp asked the Plan Commission for their
comments on encircling the development with fences. David Wolf felt that if the neighbors want a
fence they should have one but the maintenance issues need to be
addressed. Dan Pearson said the SDO
requires that farmland be buffered and in the case of a fence asked who’s
responsible for maintenance. Rob Jones
said it is presently split between the HOA and the landowner and that this
would normally be addressed at preliminary plat.
Ray Knap questioned the easement agreement DCCI has
with Mr. Valley and how far to the east the road could possibly be
shifted. Jon Sonnentag said he would
have to look into it further but he feels the road placement as depicted is
optimum. There was additional discussion
whether the road would impose any additional setbacks on Mr. Schiltgens future
home site, if the road was to the rear of the home.
Ray Knapp said that although the concept shows a
long cul-de-sac, in the future this road would actually form a loop. Dan Pearson asked Jon what Mr. Valley and Mr.
Woodruff were planning for future development.
Jon said that there are no firm plans yet. Ray stated that when E. Cove road was reconstructed
it was done to accommodate higher traffic and did not share Mr. Salmon’s
concern about the road not being designed to handle future traffic levels.
Jason Bast stated that he thinks farmers should
build the fences, not the developers.
There was additional discussion about fences and buffering in
general. Dan Pearson stated that there
needs to be a balance between the development and the farmers. He said that if there is farming going on
next to homes there will be conflict, so there needs to be compromise and
methods to mitigate it. Ray Knapp
recapped a couple points. He noted that
the Plan Commission would like to see if the road, where it abuts the Schiltgen
property, can be shifted to the east is feasible and that the buffering for
lots 2, 3 and 35 needs to be reviewed.
John Salmon asked if the Town Board would address
the runoff onto his property from Meadow Ridge.
Ray asked him to come to the Town Board meeting and bring this up during
citizen input, at which time a decision would be made whether it would be put
on a future agenda.
4. Concept review – Cottonwood Ridge, (Wilcoxson property);
John Sonnentag represented Kernon Bast. He explained that during on-site soil testing
it was discovered that the soils on the property were much less desirable than
shown on the soil survey. The soils
range from very heavy clay to sand and gravel.
Because the heavy clay poses problems for road, septic and home
construction Mr. Bast has decided to decrease the density and market a
different product to the public. This
new proposal calls for 10 home sites on the eastern portion of the property
with a larger outlot along the ridge to the west. This would eliminate the view of any homes
from Cty. Rd. U. Additionally, the
proposal calls for a single cul-de-sac with a water feature on both sides at
the entrance. An alternate plan for 15
homes was also discussed. The alternate
plan would provide for future connectivity to the west.
Ray Knapp asked if Mr. Garbe had seen this layout, Jon
answered no. There was discussion on
road placement if the Mr. Wilcoxon develops and Mr. Garbe doesn’t.
Mark Mitchell said that he likes the new layout
because it pushes the homes to the east, off of the ridge. Ray concurred. Dan asked for clarification on the road design
if the 15 lot design was used. Kernon
Bast discussed the clay and sand areas.
He stated that in the 10 lot design, most of the lots would have below
grade conventional septic systems. If
the 15 lot plan is used, the stub road would go through a rocky area and all of
the septics would not be below grade.
Dave Wolf asked for clarification on the drainage
going into outlot 1 and questioned if the drainage direction had been
changed. He was concerned with drainage
issues with lots 1, 2 and 3. Jon did not
think there was a change but said that he would check that again.
Ray noted that he had received a violation letter
from the County concerning excavation on the property. Kernon Bast explained that sandy fill was
being taken from this site to the development to the north to help in the
construction of homes. He stated that he
has explained this to the County and that the issue has been resolved.
Ray asked if there was consensus that the 10 lot
plan is a good concept. The consensus
was yes but Dan Pearson expressed concern that there were no adjacent land
owners present. It was agreed that a
letter would be sent to the adjacent landowners describing the project and
directing them to contact Ray Knapp if there were concerns. If there were, a public hearing would take
place.
There was another discussion about a fence between
Cottonwood South and the Riedel property.
Kernon Bast ended by saying that he would be willing to work with the
Riedel’s on this issue and act responsibly.
The Plan Commission reaffirmed their support for a fence between the two
properties. Additionally, the Plan
Commission agreed that it would be feasible to have the snow removal maintenance
of the cul-de-sac handled by the County as there is no connectivity to it from
the Town of
5. Review procedure for setback determination;
Rob Jones reported that he has written a draft
letter to Brian Wert that describes the setback procedure but that Bob Rolle
and Paul Mahler had not reviewed it. He
will forward this letter to them via email for review. This item will be on next months agenda.
6. Review role of Plan Commission in Riverway Ordinance Review Process;
Ray Knapp reported that he received correspondences
from Dan Bauman, WIDNR, in which Dan suggested that this would be a good time
to review the Riverway Ordinances and application process for the Town. Dan had four bullet points that he would like
to review – what is working well, what can be improved, what changes need to be
made, and is the DNR ready to write an amended approval letter. Ray reminded the Plan Commission that the
original riverway committee consisted of Bob Rolle, Gloria Wahrenbrock, and
Charlie Macdonell. He then asked the
Plan Commission members what role they would like to play in the process.
There was considerable discussion around this point
with Mark Mitchell expressing the opinion that the committee should run with
the process unless there are issues they feel the Plan Commission should be
aware of and give input on. Dan Pearson
agreed and felt the committee should bring major concerns back to the Plan
Commission. Ray Knapp said he would like
to hear firsthand what the issues are and that he would like to sit in on a few
of the early meetings.
The Plan Commission agreed that it would make sense
for the Riverway Committee to set up a meeting, in the evening, with the DNR
and invite members of the Plan Commission and Town Board to attend for
informational purposes. This meeting
would be published so that members of the community could also attend.
7. Building Permits/Utility Permits;
Rob Jones reported that he still has not received a
complete application from Comcast for the work they are doing in the Town right
of way (ROW). Reportedly they are laying
fiber optic cable on
Building permits were reviewed.
8. Committee Reports & correspondence;
Ray Knapp handed out a map of the DOT proposal for
Highway 35.
Dan Pearson reported that he has been invited to
attend the Wisconsin Grazing Conference and give a presentation on farmland
presentation and TDRs. He will be
attending with the extension service.
9. Adjourn;
David Wolf
moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:22 P.M.
Mark Mitchell seconded. Motion
passed, all in favor.